http://www.correctionsone.com/re-entry-and-recidivism/articles/4476770-Calif-inmate-mentoring-project-could-keep-offenders-out-of-jail/
The article basically mentions a program that could help rehabilitate prsioners in jail to keep them out.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
4th Amendment case
In the case Mapp vs Ohio in 1961, The Supreme Court extended the restrictions of the fourth amendment to all the state governments. Prior to this, it only applied to the fedral government.The cleveland police had heard a rumor that Dollree Mapp was harboring a suspected bombing futigive so they went to her house and demanded entry.She refused to let them in because they did not have a warrant.They ignored her and brought more officers to break open the door.She then demanded to see a search warrant and they showed her a piece of paper claiming it to be a warrant. they cuffed her feet and searched the house for the fugitive. They did not find him, but they found obscene materials such as pornographic comic books. Mapp said it was left by her previous tenant but they arrested her for possesion of obscene material.
Corrections: The Fourth Amendment
Corrections: The Fourth Amendment
the case of kyllo v. united states was a case that simply could have went great if the officers got a warrant off of tips instead of the thermal usage of kyllo home. the officers use a thermal device to see where the heat areas where high in kyllo home to see where he was assumed to be stashing marijuana. due to the fact that his personal privacy was invade and the test only showed heat and not illegal activity in respondes to the reason of them to go into his home kyllo's case was being highly debated on. the proecutor says kyllo's first amendment right wasnt valid because he was not intend to be private with his production in the first place while kyllo's lawyer simply states the production of such an"illegal" drug is nothing but low profile and private production.
the case of kyllo v. united states was a case that simply could have went great if the officers got a warrant off of tips instead of the thermal usage of kyllo home. the officers use a thermal device to see where the heat areas where high in kyllo home to see where he was assumed to be stashing marijuana. due to the fact that his personal privacy was invade and the test only showed heat and not illegal activity in respondes to the reason of them to go into his home kyllo's case was being highly debated on. the proecutor says kyllo's first amendment right wasnt valid because he was not intend to be private with his production in the first place while kyllo's lawyer simply states the production of such an"illegal" drug is nothing but low profile and private production.
NO TIME - PORSCHA P
CHECK OUT THAT NEW PORSCHA P TRACK
URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACqYgtLRTZQ
URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACqYgtLRTZQ
Fourth Amendment - PORSCHA P.
The 4th amendment gaurentees it's citizens, in which it pertains to guards against unreasonable search & seizures. A case involving the 4th amendment is Mapp v. Ohio (1961) where the supreme court ruled that all evidence obtained in the case should be thrown out due to violation of the 4th amendment. ... BOTTOM LINE!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)